About us image

We’re building a student movement to bring the country together. We cannot coexist if we cannot talk to each other – it’s that simple.

Our Work

College image


Brings together college students from across the ideological spectrum for constructive dialogue on topics happening across the nation.

Learn More
High School image

High School

Equips high school students with skills for constructive dialogue on campuses across the nation.

Learn More
International image


Students around the world are changing the discussion.

Learn More
Our Chapters

Our Chapters

“Our chapters empower young people to champion constructive dialogue and ideological diversity in their colleges and high schools. Click on each icon to learn more about a chapter!”

See What Our Chapters Have Been Doing!

Everyday, BridgeUSA students are hosting discussions, challenging polarization, and bringing young people together to improve their communities.

Our Impact

 Our movement empowers young people from across the political spectrum to fight for a less polarized society.

Take Action


On Topic: What do young people think about the January 6 Commission?

This discussion features three Bridge members from around the country and was hosted on Discord. To protect the privacy of our members, we’ve used only their first initial, Chapter location, and age as identifiers. The January 6 commission is an outside, independent commission similar to the one after 9/11, created to investigate and report on the events of January 6, 2021. The proposed legislation passed in the U.S. House 252-175, with 35 Republicans joining Democrats in support of the plan. However, it came to a standstill after a series of votes and a filibuster by Senate Republicans prevented the legislation from moving forward. We asked some of our members their thoughts on the events from January 6 and the creation of such a commission. Read the discussion below: Question: What are your current thoughts on the Storming of the Capitol months later? What do you think of a Commission to investigate the event? J, Kansas, 21: “The capital riots showed how a year of hyperpolarized, isolated and toxic culture had so much power on the election. I definitely think there should be some consideration for a commission, even if the results and actions start off minimally.” A, New York, 24: “The riots were symbolic of how much we have let our institutions decay. It’s a reflection of how much we have become accustomed to our polarized, broken politics. The Riot was a premeditated terrorist attack. I think it should not have come as a surprise to anyone given the quality of not only the public discourse, but also the perceived lack of institutional bipartisanship. A Jan. 6 Commission is needed to comprehensively investigate the origin of the riots.” R, Virginia, 20: “The capitol riots were the boiling point and explosion of long seething tensions, hatred, divisions and polarization of our broken political system. We already have investigations happening, a commission seems hyper symbolic and political in nature. I’m not super opposed to a commission, but it shouldn’t be the top priority.”  Question: Do you think it’s important to still look into what happened, even though the publicly accepted understanding is that it was an insurrection due to the election? R: “Should the rioters be found, tried, and penalized? Absolutely. We already are doing a pretty good job at that, and can do better by diverting more time and effort toward our Intel departments to get that job done instead of a Senate committee that seems more decorum and partisan than actually helpful. I’m not super opposed to a commission, but it shouldn’t be the top priority which it feels like it is.” A: “I think I disagree that the committee would be partisan. The method of choosing members of the committee was negotiated by one Democrat and one Republican, and I think it would include the same number of representatives from each party.”  R: “The notion of said committee seems partisan in nature, as it’s just a way for Dems to gain political prowess over Republicans, which the Republicans did to themselves already. I just feel like it’s a waste of time and would be conducted in bad faith.” J: “I would agree with that point. Most of the work is being done to understand anything beyond the known efforts of the event. A commission might be helpful for making a small statement, but also the current committee building work is not working out to be bipartisan.”  R: “That is a good point about the makeup of the committee. But the fact that only Dems mostly are pushing for one and Republicans are against it mostly shows this committee would be political and broken in nature.” J: “There might be a chance for making this a moment to reflect and provide a foundation for understanding – if the commission was driven by understanding the political culture throughout the U.S., divided as two parties (by vote, not culture or identity), we might be able to get somewhere.”  On The Make-Up Of the Committee A: “The reason I feel so strongly about implementing the commission is my fear that regardless of the intel report, whichever party that perceives it as politically damaging will simply try to discredit it as partisan. I think that the only way to insulate an investigation from that is to explicitly give both Dems and Republicans equal amounts of control.” R: “I am not aware of the proceedings to select a committee. I know you said it would be equal senators of Republicans and Democrats. Is that 100% for sure if the commission went through like it was in the legislation?”  A: “‘The proposed commission was modeled on the one established to investigate the 9/11 terror attacks, with 10 commissioners — five Democrats and five Republicans — who would have subpoena powers. A Democratic chair and Republican vice chair would have had to approve all subpoenas with a final report due at the end of the year. (Source: NPR).’” R: “Love the source. Wouldn’t the report be watered down, though? If I’m a Republican senator,  I realize that this is political suicide, and would do all I can to make this seem as minuscule as possible the minute I get the Senate majority. If I’m a Democrat senator, I’m looking at this as an opportunity to serve justice and totally pummel my opponent. So, it’s so hard because all of these factors come into play.” J: “Yeah. How probably would a committee like this actually come into place? I feel the events of the Jan. 6 commission vote in the Senate showed some true colors and thoughts on actually spending time on this.” R: “And you get a report that is more political than truthful in nature, and also doesn’t really add much.” J: “That seems scary in practice, and on paper.”  R: “I would much rather have the Senate establish a commission of intel, or something else, to do this, and have equal subpoena powers for updates. I just don’t like the idea of the Senate or House doing this, and they have much more important aspects to focus on.” Question: Do you think a commission would prevent another event like Jan. 6 from happening in the future? J: “No, I like to think that culture will dictate policy, and will only take time for policy to dictate culture.”  A: “I think that a commission could have second-degree outcomes that reduced the likelihood of a repeat; however, a report alone would certainly not prevent this from reoccurring. Withholding certain information from the public (as the intel report will) allows politicians to act only on public knowledge rather than on all the facts available to them. If that information was universally accessible, the legislative and executive branches would be under more pressure to address the report directly. ‘Virginia’ makes a good point that it would require a huge amount of trust to generate a report that earned the trust of both sides of the aisle.” R: “On the flip side, wouldn’t the public be more incentivized to want all of the report? So they would pressure their representatives and senators to subpoena, and vote people out who are being shady and opportunistic. That’s putting a lot more faith in the public. I would rather have faith in the public than in our politicians. Especially with social media, it’s easier to push for movements and transparency.” J: “Yes, of course.” Disclaimer: The opinions expressed on the BridgeUSA blog are not representative of the organization as whole, but of the individual BridgeUSA members having these discussions. They practice values of empathy and understanding, championed by BridgeUSA, to engage in these discussions. Check back for more discussions happening soon!

Through National Dialogue, Biden has a Chance to Heal Partisan Divide

Through National Dialogue, Biden has a Chance to Heal Partisan Divide

by Neil Wollman, Ph. D. & Senior Fellow – Bentley University To restore the civic bonds among the American people will require moving beyond the extreme partisanship that characterizes our current moment. Biden has called for healing, unity, and lowering the partisan temperature – and has reached out to Trump supporters. A National Dialogue with resulting legislation and institutional changes, and that engages all segments of our society, can start to bring us together.  To be most fruitful, this dialogue should center on common ground solutions to the steady erosion of our civic discourse, democracy, and trust in public institutions. A substantive National Dialogue would involve the creation of task forces around the country comprised of diverse citizens, trained moderators, and recognized experts, that would air diverse viewpoints and craft recommendations on how to solve our key national challenges.  Burning topics that suggest themselves include strengthening our democratic system and trust in elections; restoring belief in the value and fairness of our media, educational system, and governing institutions; restoring civility to our public life; and promoting a society that offers opportunity and justice to all and where people can unite in common purpose. To have real teeth, the task forces ought to be organized as official Presidential government entities, and their composition and logistics should be worked out on a bipartisan basis.  Ideally, there should be an extra emphasis on involving Trump supporters in task force deliberations, as a tangible demonstration of Biden’s sincerity in taking seriously the discontent that fueled Donald Trump’s rise. Finally, the recommendations of the task forces need to be accorded real, rather than merely rhetorical force, and incorporated into Executive branch and Congressional policy deliberations, legislation, and the work of public and private institutions.  It will take years to right the listing ship that America, symbolically, has become, far from the beacon of opportunity and hope that our nation has long represented in the world.  But we can make a start to heal our divisions,  rebuild our institutions, and help Americans move beyond the cynicism and despair many feel about our current society and politics.

Issue Brief – Economy

Issue Brief – Economy

Economic mobility is diminishing. Millennials and Gen Z are projected to be the first generations to be worse off than our parents. Youth in minority, rural, and countless other communities struggle to make ends meet. Our economic futures are not as bright as the American Dream has promised for centuries. But our political system has not addressed the lack of economic mobility. The Problem of Intergenerational Wealth Already, Millennials have slightly less wealth than Baby Boomers did at the same age. In 2016, the median net worth of Millennial households was about $12,500 in 2016, compared to $20,700 for Boomer households of the same age in 1983. Additionally, The United States prime-age labor force participation continues to lag that of major industrialized countries by a significant margin. The Problem of the Pandemic The COVID-19 pandemic is likely to exacerbate this wealth gap for Millennials and Gen Z, with a long-term negative impact on the lifetime earnings and prosperity of young Americans as they miss key formative job experience early in their careers. Further, at the height of quarantine, the U.S. youth unemployment rate peaked at 26.9%— the highest recorded rate since the government started collecting data in 1948—despite having one of the lowest youth unemployment rates in the developed world before the pandemic.  The Problem of Inefficient Government Spending Every year, federal and state governments spend trillions of dollars to end poverty and in entitlement programs, yet millions (Census Bureau) of Americans continue to be trapped in intergenerational cycles of poverty. With inefficient spending, the government will continue to add to the multi-trillion dollar debt burden, which is an intergenerational transfer that will result in higher taxes and lower government benefits for young people in the future. Shared Values on Economic Mobility ● We should work towards making sure young people should have access to benefits such as health insurance and family leave no matter the sector in which they work. ● All work has value, so we should aim for all workers to be able to afford basic necessities for themselves and their families, and enjoy an increasing quality of life. ● Educational attainment is one of the best indicators of lifelong earning potential and can be used to expand opportunities for economic mobility. ● Everybody should have the freedom to engage in the work they love and negotiate employment arrangements that benefit them. ● Government resources and private charity should be targeted to those who need it the most. .ugb-e4b2265 hr.ugb-divider__hr{margin-left:auto !important;margin-right:auto !important} Gen-Z Proposed Bipartisan Solutions COMING SOON .ugb-1c929bc hr.ugb-divider__hr{margin-left:auto !important;margin-right:auto !important} Authored by: .ugb-d5cb6d7 .ugb-team-member__item.ugb-team-member__item1 .ugb-team-member__image{background-image:url(https://13g3ug2c670s488b483ny6i5-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/Barba-headshot-1024×682.jpeg)}.ugb-d5cb6d7 .ugb-team-member__item.ugb-team-member__item2 .ugb-team-member__image{background-image:url(https://13g3ug2c670s488b483ny6i5-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/DanielHeadshot-42.jpg)}.ugb-d5cb6d7 .ugb-team-member__name{color:#ffffff !important}.ugb-d5cb6d7 .ugb-team-member__position{color:#ffffff !important}.ugb-d5cb6d7 .ugb-button.ugb-button–has-icon.ugb-button–has-icon svg{width:px;height:px}Jesse BarbaSenior Director, Young InvinciblesDaniel Di MartinoActivist, Speaker, Writer